Design by Emily @ Emily's Reading Room |
To plagiarize or not to plagiarize? That is the question.
Except it shouldn't be. Ever. To me the answer to that question should be a no-brainer. Plagiarism, or the stealing of someone else's words or ideas, should be something that no sane person would consider. Ever. However, if my several years of experience in education have taught me anything, it's that plagiarism is an all too common resort for many budding writers. But why?
I tell my students on the first day of class every semester that there are two reasons why students plagiarize.
- They did not understand the assignment.
- Their life blew up near a deadline.
Are these good excuses? Of course not. There is never a good excuse to plagiarize; however, it happens.
But how does this translate to the blogging community?
But how does this translate to the blogging community?
Fortunately, my experiences (and they have been numerous) with plagiarism have remained firmly in the academic setting. Although I have read accounts of other bloggers who have had their reviews plagiarized, I personally have never experienced that type of infringement (as far as I know). I imagine, though, that plagiarism in the blogosphere stems mostly from blogger envy, something I touched on in my blogger development post for Armchair BEA a few days ago. It can be tough to watch your little blog languish while another's grows by the hour. Sometimes someone else was able to articulate exactly what you were thinking or feeling while reading better than you every could, so you "borrow" a few of their phrases or ideas. It's a form of flattery, right? WRONG.
So how does one avoid plagiarism while blogging? For me it's pretty easy. I started my blog because I wanted to share my thoughts on the books I read. Mine. So no content worries there. However, I follow some amazing bloggers, and sometimes their posts inspire me, and I want to respond in more detail than just the comments section, or I want to reference something they said. To avoid plagiarism in an academic setting I would bust out my MLA handbook (I have numerous editions), format my in-text citations (author's last name and page number), and painstakingly construct my Works Cited list (organized alphabetically by the authors' last names); however, the blogging world is much more casual, so I just link to the blogger's post that inspired me or whose concept I referenced or survey I filled out. Pretty straightforward, and most of them are grateful for the shout-out. Bonus: It ups traffic on their site. Win-win.
The grey area for me is images. While most people who plagiarize content do so intentionally, many people infringe copyright on images accidentally. It's easy to see why. You can find anything on the web these days. The content is so diverse, and there's so much of it. Also, it's constantly growing and changing. What was there yesterday may have been amended, moved, or deleted altogether today. Not to mention, so much of the Internet's content today is user-generated, and it's so easy to share things you find on the web. Look at YouTube for example. There's a "Share" button underneath each video encouraging re-posting. I think things sometimes just get lost on the inter-web. An image or a video is posted and then re-posted, so many times it becomes nearly impossible to track down the original source. As the Internet continues to grow and change, most of us take for granted that what's there is fair game. You post it, and it's open for general public use. Except it's not always. Images, like content, are subject to credit. In the case of a fantastically original art piece, it seems obvious, but photographs of public people and places are more obscure. Especially if you are using a search engine like Google image which may return to you thousands of nearly identical images. Like I tell my students, when in doubt, cite it. But do book covers fall into this category? If I upload an image of a book cover from Barnes and Noble or Amazon or even the author's website, does that deserve a shout-out? Despite my firm stance on blogging ethics, this question more than any other has stumped me today. I did a little low-brow research and never found a clear-cut answer. At best, I found that book covers fall under the fair use act, and most publishers and authors are happy to have their books promoted. Any insight into this murky water would be appreciated!
All in all, the topic of blogger ethics all boils down to one word: respect. That's right, R-E-S-P-E-C-T. And who am I to argue with Aretha?
So how does one avoid plagiarism while blogging? For me it's pretty easy. I started my blog because I wanted to share my thoughts on the books I read. Mine. So no content worries there. However, I follow some amazing bloggers, and sometimes their posts inspire me, and I want to respond in more detail than just the comments section, or I want to reference something they said. To avoid plagiarism in an academic setting I would bust out my MLA handbook (I have numerous editions), format my in-text citations (author's last name and page number), and painstakingly construct my Works Cited list (organized alphabetically by the authors' last names); however, the blogging world is much more casual, so I just link to the blogger's post that inspired me or whose concept I referenced or survey I filled out. Pretty straightforward, and most of them are grateful for the shout-out. Bonus: It ups traffic on their site. Win-win.
The grey area for me is images. While most people who plagiarize content do so intentionally, many people infringe copyright on images accidentally. It's easy to see why. You can find anything on the web these days. The content is so diverse, and there's so much of it. Also, it's constantly growing and changing. What was there yesterday may have been amended, moved, or deleted altogether today. Not to mention, so much of the Internet's content today is user-generated, and it's so easy to share things you find on the web. Look at YouTube for example. There's a "Share" button underneath each video encouraging re-posting. I think things sometimes just get lost on the inter-web. An image or a video is posted and then re-posted, so many times it becomes nearly impossible to track down the original source. As the Internet continues to grow and change, most of us take for granted that what's there is fair game. You post it, and it's open for general public use. Except it's not always. Images, like content, are subject to credit. In the case of a fantastically original art piece, it seems obvious, but photographs of public people and places are more obscure. Especially if you are using a search engine like Google image which may return to you thousands of nearly identical images. Like I tell my students, when in doubt, cite it. But do book covers fall into this category? If I upload an image of a book cover from Barnes and Noble or Amazon or even the author's website, does that deserve a shout-out? Despite my firm stance on blogging ethics, this question more than any other has stumped me today. I did a little low-brow research and never found a clear-cut answer. At best, I found that book covers fall under the fair use act, and most publishers and authors are happy to have their books promoted. Any insight into this murky water would be appreciated!
All in all, the topic of blogger ethics all boils down to one word: respect. That's right, R-E-S-P-E-C-T. And who am I to argue with Aretha?
Video from YouTube.com by Tatan Brown